Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Luke J Edward's avatar

Great article.

I am of the opinion that injecting money into the foreign world is a doomed endeavor, and may as well be welfare / embezzlement with extra steps. If the courts can rule that foreign children put into quasi-enslavement for American corporations in foreign countries is not of the concern of America (rightfully so, despite how distasteful it may be), then providing unlimited money with no oversight to foreign countries is not to the interest of America, either. There is no good answer to providing foreign aid to the world, except for people to deliberately participate in it themselves, but corporates would never allow their drones the freedom of opening their minds to enlightenment.

The current Supreme Court has to have some checks to their position with the perversion of justices, such as Clarence Thomas taking open bribes, and cherry picking by the current administration of what other justices attend for nonsensical moments (such as the one at one of the award shows being accused of bias opinions being spouted at speeches for the winners).

I am tired of corporations hijacking the system, and feel that the eventual conclusion will be the deaths of people, at the hands of the old and ignorant. Then they'll cry "ageism!!!". History is doomed to be repeated, I suppose.

As for the "earned" position of the aristocracy, I would say there has been few who have ever rightfully earned such titles. I do not personally champion more modern aristocrats such as Andrew Carnegie, and I definitely do not look kindly on the older, who have only been motivated by interests in tribal groups in the psychological sense (us vs them, winners vs losers). Anyone in a position of authority has to be looked at with skepticism, and anyone saying the system is too complex to be understood, is trying to keep you ignorant.

Keep up the great writing.

Jonathan's avatar

Well said!

2 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?